02712nas a2200325 4500008004100000022001400041245015600055210006900211260001300280300001000293490000700303520157800310653002801888653002201916653004201938653001301980653003401993653001302027653003602040653001302076653002802089100002002117700002402137700001702161700002402178700002002202700002602222700002002248856011802268 2012 eng d a1362-496200aVARIANT: Command Line, Web service and Web interface for fast and accurate functional characterization of variants found by Next-Generation Sequencing.0 aVARIANT Command Line Web service and Web interface for fast and  c2012 Jul aW54-80 v403 a

The massive use of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies is uncovering an unexpected amount of variability. The functional characterization of such variability, particularly in the most common form of variation found, the Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs), has become a priority that needs to be addressed in a systematic way. VARIANT (VARIant ANalyis Tool) reports information on the variants found that include consequence type and annotations taken from different databases and repositories (SNPs and variants from dbSNP and 1000 genomes, and disease-related variants from the Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) catalog, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) mutations, etc). VARIANT also produces a rich variety of annotations that include information on the regulatory (transcription factor or miRNA-binding sites, etc.) or structural roles, or on the selective pressures on the sites affected by the variation. This information allows extending the conventional reports beyond the coding regions and expands the knowledge on the contribution of non-coding or synonymous variants to the phenotype studied. Contrarily to other tools, VARIANT uses a remote database and operates through efficient RESTful Web Services that optimize search and transaction operations. In this way, local problems of installation, update or disk size limitations are overcome without the need of sacrifice speed (thousands of variants are processed per minute). VARIANT is available at: http://variant.bioinfo.cipf.es.

10aDatabases, Nucleic Acid10aGenetic Variation10aHigh-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing10aInternet10aMolecular Sequence Annotation10amutation10aPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide10aSoftware10aUser-Computer Interface1 aMedina, Ignacio1 aDe Maria, Alejandro1 aBleda, Marta1 aSalavert, Francisco1 aAlonso, Roberto1 aGonzalez, Cristina, Y1 aDopazo, Joaquin uhttp://clinbioinfosspa.es/content/variant-command-line-web-service-and-web-interface-fast-and-accurate-functional03382nas a2200325 4500008004100000022001400041245007200055210006900127260001600196300000800212490000700220520234600227653001502573653002102588653004402609653002602653653002802679653001102707653003002718653001302748653001102761653004402772653003002816653003102846100002002877700001902897700002502916700002002941856009502961 2009 eng d a1471-216400aGene set internal coherence in the context of functional profiling.0 aGene set internal coherence in the context of functional profili c2009 Apr 27 a1970 v103 a

BACKGROUND: Functional profiling methods have been extensively used in the context of high-throughput experiments and, in particular, in microarray data analysis. Such methods use available biological information to define different types of functional gene modules (e.g. gene ontology -GO-, KEGG pathways, etc.) whose representation in a pre-defined list of genes is further studied. In the most popular type of microarray experimental designs (e.g. up- or down-regulated genes, clusters of co-expressing genes, etc.) or in other genomic experiments (e.g. Chip-on-chip, epigenomics, etc.) these lists are composed by genes with a high degree of co-expression. Therefore, an implicit assumption in the application of functional profiling methods within this context is that the genes corresponding to the modules tested are effectively defining sets of co-expressing genes. Nevertheless not all the functional modules are biologically coherent entities in terms of co-expression, which will eventually hinder its detection with conventional methods of functional enrichment.

RESULTS: Using a large collection of microarray data we have carried out a detailed survey of internal correlation in GO terms and KEGG pathways, providing a coherence index to be used for measuring functional module co-regulation. An unexpected low level of internal correlation was found among the modules studied. Only around 30% of the modules defined by GO terms and 57% of the modules defined by KEGG pathways display an internal correlation higher than the expected by chance.This information on the internal correlation of the genes within the functional modules can be used in the context of a logistic regression model in a simple way to improve their detection in gene expression experiments.

CONCLUSION: For the first time, an exhaustive study on the internal co-expression of the most popular functional categories has been carried out. Interestingly, the real level of coexpression within many of them is lower than expected (or even inexistent), which will preclude its detection by means of most conventional functional profiling methods. If the gene-to-function correlation information is used in functional profiling methods, the results obtained improve the ones obtained by conventional enrichment methods.

10aAlgorithms10aBreast Neoplasms10aCarcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating10aComputational Biology10aDatabases, Nucleic Acid10aFemale10aGene Expression Profiling10aGenomics10aHumans10aOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis10aPapillomavirus Infections10aReproducibility of Results1 aMontaner, David1 aMinguez, Pablo1 aAl-Shahrour, Fátima1 aDopazo, Joaquin uhttp://clinbioinfosspa.es/content/gene-set-internal-coherence-context-functional-profiling