BRCA1 Alternative splicing landscape in breast tissue samples.

TitleBRCA1 Alternative splicing landscape in breast tissue samples.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsRomero, A, Garcia-Garcia, F, López-Perolio, I, de Garibay, GRuiz, García-Sáenz, JA, Garre, P, Ayllón, P, Benito, E, Dopazo, J, Díaz-Rubio, E, Caldés, T, de la Hoya, M
JournalBMC Cancer
Volume15
Pagination219
Date Published2015 Apr 03
ISSN1471-2407
KeywordsAlternative Splicing; Biopsy; Breast; Breast Neoplasms; Female; gene silencing; Genes, BRCA1; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Neoplasm Grading
Abstract

BACKGROUND: BRCA1 is a key protein in cell network, involved in DNA repair pathways and cell cycle. Recently, the ENIGMA consortium has reported a high number of alternative splicing (AS) events at this locus in blood-derived samples. However, BRCA1 splicing pattern in breast tissue samples is unknown. Here, we provide an accurate description of BRCA1 splicing events distribution in breast tissue samples.

METHODS: BRCA1 splicing events were scanned in 70 breast tumor samples, 4 breast samples from healthy individuals and in 72 blood-derived samples by capillary electrophoresis (capillary EP). Molecular subtype was identified in all tumor samples. Splicing events were considered predominant if their relative expression level was at least the 10% of the full-length reference signal.

RESULTS: 54 BRCA1 AS events were identified, 27 of them were annotated as predominant in at least one sample. Δ5q, Δ13, Δ9, Δ5 and ▼1aA were significantly more frequently annotated as predominant in breast tumor samples than in blood-derived samples. Predominant splicing events were, on average, more frequent in tumor samples than in normal breast tissue samples (P = 0.010). Similarly, likely inactivating splicing events (PTC-NMDs, Non-Coding, Δ5 and Δ18) were more frequently annotated as predominant in tumor than in normal breast samples (P = 0.020), whereas there were no significant differences for other splicing events (No-Fs) frequency distribution between tumor and normal breast samples (P = 0.689).

CONCLUSIONS: Our results complement recent findings by the ENIGMA consortium, demonstrating that BRCA1 AS, despite its tremendous complexity, is similar in breast and blood samples, with no evidences for tissue specific AS events. Further on, we conclude that somatic inactivation of BRCA1 through spliciogenic mutations is, at best, a rare mechanism in breast carcinogenesis, albeit our data detects an excess of likely inactivating AS events in breast tumor samples.

DOI10.1186/s12885-015-1145-9
Alternate JournalBMC Cancer
PubMed ID25884417
PubMed Central IDPMC4393587